Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Indicators on case laws on sub agent You Should Know
Blog Article
Justia – a comprehensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, together with case law at both the federal and state levels.
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Those people remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
In that sense, case legislation differs from just one jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in The big apple would not be decided using case law from California. Alternatively, New York courts will analyze the issue relying on binding precedent . If no previous decisions about the issue exist, The big apple courts could possibly take a look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority relatively than binding authority. Other factors including how old the decision is as well as closeness into the facts will affect the authority of the specific case in common legislation.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or even the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
13 . Const. P. 209/2025 (S.B.) Saifullah Jamali (Disable) V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi After arguing the matter at some size, both parties have agreed on the disposal of the instant petition on the premise that the DIGP Malir will listen to the petitioner in addition to private respondents and will choose care of the many elements of the case and assure that no harassment shall be caused to both the parties.
Whilst there isn't any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds very little sway. Still, if there is no precedent from the home state, relevant case law from another state can be regarded as by the court.
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he had endured in his home, also to prevent him from abusing other children inside the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all-around within the foster care system.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents with the boy or Woman tend not to approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they might Reduce off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that is a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings via the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf with the boy by a guardian advertisement litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf in the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for your dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Work opportunities with DCFS.
Article 27 on the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination in the time of appointment of service but after the appointment likewise. The disparity while in the pay back scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is in the very clear negation on the regulation laid down by the Supreme Court in its several pronouncements. Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. In the event the appeal is not really decided within that timeframe, he/she will then approach the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided via the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and involve all notable cases decided through the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have heard the discovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession from the subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises Should the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” usually read more are not binding, but could be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.